Beschreibung
As the United States experiences dramatic demographic change—and as our society’s income inequality continues to rise—promoting racial, ethnic, and economic inclusion at selective colleges has become more important than ever. At the same time, however, many Americans—including several members of the U.S. Supreme Court—are uneasy with explicitly using race as a factor in college admissions. The Court’s decision in Fisher v. University of Texas emphasized that universities can use race in admissions only when “necessary,” and that universities bear “the ultimate burden of demonstrating, before turning to racial classifications, that available, workable race-neutral alternatives do not suffice.”With race-based admission programs increasingly curtailed, The Future of Affirmative Action explores race-neutral approaches as a method of promoting college diversity after Fisher decision. The volume suggests that Fisher might on the one hand be a further challenge to the use of racial criteria in admissions, but on the other presents a new opportunity to tackle, at long last, the burgeoning economic divisions in our system of higher education, and in society as a whole.Contributions from: Danielle Allen (Princeton); John Brittain (University of the District of Columbia) and Benjamin Landy (MSNBC.com); Nancy Cantor and Peter Englot (Rutgers–Newark); Anthony P. Carnevale , Stephen J. Rose, and Jeff Strohl (Georgetown University); Dalton Conley (New York University); Arthur L. Coleman and Teresa E. Taylor (EducationCounsel LLC); Matthew N. Gaertner (Pearson); Sara Goldrick-Rab (University of Wisconsin–Madison); Scott Greytak (Campinha Bacote LLC); Catharine Hill (Vassar); Richard D. Kahlenberg (The Century Foundation); Richard L. McCormick (Rutgers); Nancy G. McDuff (University of Georgia); Halley Potter (The Century Foundation); Alexandria Walton Radford (RTI International) and Jessica Howell (College Board); Richard Sander (UCLA School of Law); and Marta Tienda (Princeton).
Kurzbeschreibung
As the United States experiences dramatic demographic change—and as our society’s income inequality continues to rise—promoting racial, ethnic, and economic inclusion at selective colleges has become more important than ever. At the same time, however, many Americans—including several members of the U.S. Supreme Court—are uneasy with explicitly using race as a factor in college admissions. The Court’s decision in Fisher v. University of Texas emphasized that universities can use race in admissions only when “necessary,” and that universities bear “the ultimate burden of demonstrating, before turning to racial classifications, that available, workable race-neutral alternatives do not suffice.”With race-based admission programs increasingly curtailed, The Future of Affirmative Action explores race-neutral approaches as a method of promoting college diversity after Fisher decision. The volume suggests that Fisher might on the one hand be a further challenge to the use of racial criteria in admissions, but on the other presents a new opportunity to tackle, at long last, the burgeoning economic divisions in our system of higher education, and in society as a whole.Contributions from: Danielle Allen (Princeton); John Brittain (University of the District of Columbia) and Benjamin Landy (MSNBC.com); Nancy Cantor and Peter Englot (Rutgers–Newark); Anthony P. Carnevale , Stephen J. Rose, and Jeff Strohl (Georgetown University); Dalton Conley (New York University); Arthur L. Coleman and Teresa E. Taylor (EducationCounsel LLC); Matthew N. Gaertner (Pearson); Sara Goldrick-Rab (University of Wisconsin–Madison); Scott Greytak (Campinha Bacote LLC); Catharine Hill (Vassar); Richard D. Kahlenberg (The Century Foundation); Richard L. McCormick (Rutgers); Nancy G. McDuff (University of Georgia); Halley Potter (The Century Foundation); Alexandria Walton Radford (RTI International) and Jessica Howell (College Board); Richard Sander (UCLA School of Law); and Marta Tienda (Princeton).
ePUB Typ
Reflowable ePUB: Sind dynamische eBooks, die auf unterschiedlichen Geräten und Bildschirmgrößen lesbar sind. Diese Art von ePUB passt sich an die Größe und Auflösung des Bildschirms an, auf dem sie gelesen wird. Der Text wird automatisch umgebrochen, um eine optimale Lesbarkeit zu gewährleisten. Reflowable ePUBs eignen sich am besten für Texte, die keine festgelegte Struktur oder ein festes Layout erfordern, wie z. B. Romane oder Bücher mit hauptsächlich textbasierten Inhalten.
Fixed Layout ePUB: Sind E-Books mit einem festen Layout, das auf dem Seitenlayout eines gedruckten Buches basiert. Diese Art von ePUB eignet sich am besten für eBooks, die Bilder, Grafiken oder Tabellen enthalten, die in einem bestimmten Layout angezeigt werden müssen. Fixed Layout ePUBs sind ideal für Comics, Kinderbücher, Kochbücher und Bildbände.
Interactive ePUB: Sind eBooks, die über interaktive Elemente wie Audio, Video, Animationen, Hyperlinks und andere Multimedia-Elemente verfügen. Diese Art von ePUBs ist am besten für Bildungsbücher, Lehrbücher und andere Lernmaterialien geeignet, die interaktive Elemente enthalten, um das Lernen zu verbessern. Es kann sein, dass einige Lesegeräte oder eBook-Reader möglicherweise nicht alle Arten von ePUB-Dateien unterstützen.